The question of legality of one’s Rev

1857.

third.-The fresh new 4th wedding off Courtroom “Crown and you will Anchor” An excellent.O.F. got recognized from the a meal during the Cousin. Franklin’s, Hallway Quay. Mr. C. B. Dashwood occupied the fresh new sofa, plus it is actually reported that the brand new Courtroom next consisted of 90 participants.

Jan

Messrs. Charles J. Palmer, B. Fenn, Rev. H. Squire, Dumbleton, R. Roentgen. B. Norman, Burton, and you will J. Bayly is select the brand new members of anyone Library Committee.

p. 207 The human body from a great whale, which was pulled on Winterton, had been presented to the Church Ordinary.

Brand new Rev. W. D. Go, the fresh new minister out-of St. Mary’s, Southtown, got, before leaving Southsea, been presented with a handbag away from ?61.

twenty-first.-The “Sisters” was actually within the accident that have one of many brick piers away from the brand new Connection, that it had most damaged.

Feb. last.-A keen Anti-Tax conference ended up being kept from the Town Hall. The brand new Mayor presided, together with adopting the took part in the proceedings:-Messrs. George Danby-Palmer, Bradbeer, Garson Blake, W. Livingston, S. B. Cory, R. Hammond, J. Clowes, J. H. Harrison, J. Rivett and you may J. Fiddes. Mr. S. Bradbeer appeared as if the new mover in this number.

Feb. 21st.-An effective “Poor’s Price” appointment ended up being held within Masonic Hallway. Mr. W. Livingston presided, and you will a resolution protesting up against the 1s. 6d. quarterly speed are followed. Messrs J. Rivett, Joseph Neave, Royal, Roentgen. Bailey, Nichols, and you will F. Starling spoke on the subject, since conduct of your Guardians is actually defended because of the Mr. J. H. Harrison, one of many Panel.

Feb. 25th.-An instance hence happy significant interest, had been read at State Courtroom, Tolhouse-hall, up until the Judge (T. J. Birch, Esq.) The latest plaintiff is actually Mr. John Cobb, leather vendor, to own who Mr. C. H. Chamberlin featured; the defendants was in fact Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and G. D. Palmer, who had been represented of the Mr. J. L. Cufaude. The newest plaintiff stated that he was a candidate with the workplace away from Councillor on the elizabeth such as for instance during the solicitation away from Messrs. W. N. Burroughs and you can Grams. D. Palmer. During the time the guy turned an applicant the guy decidedly advised all of them which he wouldn’t pay regarding his very own wallet so much more than just ?ten toward costs of one’s election, also it is realized the Liberal party, to which he belonged, manage subscribe others. The evening before the election the guy obtained a quotation out of exactly what the expense was indeed probably be, plus outcome of he at once spotted one another Mr. Burroughs and you may Mr. G. D. Palmer. One estimate, he thought, amounted in order to throughout the ?forty five, due to the fact memberships altogether amounted so you can but ?42. After particular dialogue they provided to keep him harmless of the quantity of the expense which may meet or exceed the sum of licensed, and then he and Mr. Burroughs following ran p. 208 for the Committee-space of North-ward, in which Mr. Burroughs told you that they had generated preparations due to their buddy John Cobb effective the marketplace-ward. The expense of the election, that he (the fresh plaintiff) missing, amounted entirely so you’re able to ?58 1s. 7d. The bill, hence, which he today claimed on defendants are ?sixteen 1s. 7d.-Brand new plaintiff, into the mix-test by Mr. Cufaude, admitted you to ?39 of the whole amount is actually for – -.-Mr. Cufaude argued when, once the plaintiff mentioned, the brand new defendants got offered him a vow on excess expenditures, the latest be certain that must come in composing. And you can, if in case the data try real, hence, not, the guy debated, it actually was hopeless into the plaintiff to recoup, inasmuch as he themselves had allowed one a corner from the whole of the costs is to have – -, that was an unlawful act.-Mr. Chamberlin contended that plaintiff, once finding the newest vow throughout the defendants, acted merely abreast of the fresh new believe of the promise, hence for this reason, because they had joined upon a wedding to spend the money, they were responsible. The bucks, additionally, was not spent because of the plaintiff, however, by committee designated so you’re able to perform the fresh election, and you can up until the election is more, the new plaintiff wasn’t conscious that some of the money had come spent for the – -.-His Honour said it had been clear brand new verify need to have become in writing. He was off viewpoint, also, that plaintiff was not bound to afford the illegal charges, and consequently he may not render his action for cash that he said.-The fresh plaintiff are, properly, non-suited.